Comments on: Succeeding in the search engines http://www.seabourn.org/succeeding-in-the-search-engines/ Connecting you to ministry around the globe Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:24:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Quickregister Link Exchange http://www.seabourn.org/succeeding-in-the-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-20 Quickregister Link Exchange Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:34:00 +0000 http://www.keithseabourn.dreamhosters.com/?p=37#comment-20 Keith, I saw your post regarding <a HREF="http://www.quickregister.net/infowizards" rel="nofollow">marketing</A> . You are welcome to place a link to your blog or website on our high traffic website for free. See: <a HREF="http://www.quickregister.net/infowizards/" rel="nofollow"> http://www.quickregister.net/infowizards</A> We have a specific category for <a HREF="http://www.quickregister.net/infowizards" rel="nofollow">marketing</A> . Your listing will be indexed in the search engines under <a HREF="http://www.quickregister.net/infowizards" rel="nofollow">marketing</A> . It will also be a permanent link. Thank you, John, <a HREF="http://www.quickregister.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.quickregister.net</A> Free Search Engine Submission Service. Keith,

I saw your post
regarding marketing .

You are welcome to place a link to
your blog or website on our high
traffic website for free. See:

http://www.quickregister.net/infowizards

We have a specific category for marketing .
Your listing will be indexed in the search
engines under marketing . It will
also be a permanent link.

Thank you,

John,

http://www.quickregister.net
Free Search Engine Submission Service.

]]> By: Greg http://www.seabourn.org/succeeding-in-the-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-19 Greg Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:42:00 +0000 http://www.keithseabourn.dreamhosters.com/?p=37#comment-19 Anne Kennedy did a poor job on reporting on this at SearchEngineWatch and thus created this confusion. The latest data from Enquiro shows the opposite to your conclusion. It has actually been determined that "72.3% of people using Google choose the organic results over the sponsored results." What the article was showing was that 85% of the 100% of people that choose a sponsored result choose one of the top 3 sponsored results. Additionally, it shows with SEO (organic results) that it is the compelling text that a person sees as they scan down the page that helps more effectively create a click through than the positions alone. Why? Because most people view the page in an "F" viewing pattern... (see link: <a HREF="http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2005/02/28/213516/cropped.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2005/02/28/213516/cropped.jpg</A>) -- The correct conclusion is that orangic results are best and the key is to be above the fold (top 5 or 6) with compelling content. If you don't have organic results, then you must be in the top 3 sponsored links to aggregate an audience effectively. Details can be found here. <a HREF="http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/3488076" rel="nofollow">http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/3488076</A> <a HREF="http://www.enquiro.com/eye-tracking-pr.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.enquiro.com/eye-tracking-pr.asp</A> Greg Outlaw <a HREF="http://www.AllAboutGOD.com" rel="nofollow">AllAboutGOD.com</A> Anne Kennedy did a poor job on reporting on this at SearchEngineWatch and thus created this confusion.

The latest data from Enquiro shows the opposite to your conclusion. It has actually been determined that “72.3% of people using Google choose the organic results over the sponsored results.”

What the article was showing was that 85% of the 100% of people that choose a sponsored result choose one of the top 3 sponsored results. Additionally, it shows with SEO (organic results) that it is the compelling text that a person sees as they scan down the page that helps more effectively create a click through than the positions alone. Why? Because most people view the page in an “F” viewing pattern… (see link: http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2005/02/28/213516/cropped.jpg) —

The correct conclusion is that orangic results are best and the key is to be above the fold (top 5 or 6) with compelling content. If you don’t have organic results, then you must be in the top 3 sponsored links to aggregate an audience effectively.

Details can be found here.
http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/3488076

http://www.enquiro.com/eye-tracking-pr.asp

Greg Outlaw
AllAboutGOD.com

]]>