Keith Seabourn

I read an interesting article about the power of communities, as demonstrated in the recent election. The important part is quoted is below. My highlights are in red.

These numbers from Meetup.com ought to be Exhibit A in countering those who still pooh-pooh the Internet’s ability to bring about meaningful social change in a rapid manner:

About 750,000 individuals registered for various political Meetup Groups, with some 450,000 attending at least one of 25,000 meetings held nationwide.

Kerry supporters alone numbered almost 132,000 strong in 653 cities worldwide, and they conducted 8,700 events between them.

President Bush’s supporters numbered fewer than 5% of the Kerry total and Bush events fewer than 10% . . . but these folks held much cheerier post-election bashes.

Myles Weissleder, Meetup’s vice president of communications, sums it up thusly: “Twenty-five thousand meetings where no meetings existed before. Community connections where there were once none. Meetup Groups helped spur millions of dollars raised, tens of thousands of signatures signed, record voter turnouts and best of all – a newly empowered electorate.”

Some will carp that all those newly minted activists holding all those living-room meetings didn’t do Kerry any good where it counted. They are shortsighted.

This is how political campaigns are going to be run from now on.

I read an interesting article on leadership from someone I have learned from before. Until I read this article, however, I didn’t know that Peter Drucker had been a longtime counsellor to Rick Warren, pastor of Saddleback Community Church, and author of The Purpose Driven Church and The Purpose Driven Life.

On his 95th birthday, Drucker granted a rare interview with Forbes at Rick Warren’s request.

Some thoughts from the interview:

Leaders ask “What needs to be done”? These needs should then be correlated with “Of those things that would make a difference, which are right for me?”

I’ve seen a great many people who are exceedingly good at execution, but exceedingly poor at picking the important things. They are magnificent at getting the unimportant things done.

Leaders … know what they are trying to do. They are purpose driven–yes, mission driven. They know how to establish a mission.

[Leaders] know how to say no. … the effective ones learn how to say no and stick with it.

I always advise my friend Rick Warren, “Don’t tell me what you’re doing, Rick. Tell me what you stopped doing.”

When you’re alone, in your secret office, ask the question, “What needs to be done?” Develop your priorities and don’t have more than two.

Effective leaders match the objective needs of their company with the subjective competencies.

Build on your strengths and find strong people to do the other necessary tasks.

You know, I was the first one to talk about leadership 50 years ago, but there is too much talk, too much emphasis on [charismatic leadership] today and not enough on effectiveness.

I required myself to identify something I will do based on this article. Here’s mine:

Map what needs to be done against what am I good at doing. I’ll write down two priorities and measure my effectiveness in executing these ruthlessly.

Read the article. What leadership principles will you write down?

I don’t know about you, but I’m not particularly excited about the plans
to offer wireless telephone service on airplanes. Now, wi-fi internet
access is a good thing! I’m not sure I’ll be able to afford it, but it
would be a big productivity boost for travelers.

But I really don’t want to sit beside someone carrying on their
conversation over the roar of jet engines. Do you?

It would probably sound like one long Verizon commercial, “Can you hear
me now? Hello! Can you hear me now?”

There’s a website to help us out. Visit http://www.coudal.com/Shhh.pdf
and download cards you can give to your airplane seatmate, or the guy at
the next table in the restaurant, or the lady behind you at the ball
game.

It’s 4:30 a.m. here in Orange County, California, but my body thinks it’s in Orange County, Florida, where it’s 7:30 a.m.! I’ve been fighting a losing battle for the past hour, so I decided to get up. Ahhh, jet lag is one of the results of crossing time zones. But this morning, it feels
more like jet lead, since by body is leading the actual time! A college friend who spent his career in the Army introduced me to melatonin to help with jet lag, but I forgot mine this trip!

I’m in southern California to meet with Jesus Film Project leaders and others who want to find ways to combine the Jesus Film Project tools and resources with new methods of delivering via the internet. In October, the Jesus film made it’s internet debut. Although the film has been available on the internet for several years, the Jesus Film Project recently acquired total rights for the film which means they can now develop new ways to present it, ways that are more effective in the internet communications media.

We are spending today discussing how to capitalize on the new opportunities available.

Last night over dinner, Jim Green (the new executive director of the Jesus Film Project) and I were reminiscing about our shared experiences during many years together on the African continent. Mike Waid, a more recent friend although a long-term Campus Crusade staff, is giving leadership to the development of internet use of Jesus Film Project tools and resources.

The Jesus film is probably the most effective evangelistic tool in the history of the world. It is available in in 887 languages, as of January 1, 2005. The number changes every month as they continue to add new translations. The cumulative viewing and listening audience is nearing 6
billion people! Almost 200 million people have indicated decisions for Christ. Over 1,500 denominations and mission agencies are using the film. I know of nothing in recorded history that has been used this widely by God to introduce people to new life in Christ.

Rev. 7:9-10 is becoming even more true:

After this I looked and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands. And they cried out in a loud voice:
“Salvation belongs to our God,
who sits on the throne,
and to the Lamb.”

I’ve been using the Yahoo Desktop Search beta for a few days now. Over the past few months, I’ve tried desktop search tools from Copernic, Lookout, and Google. As you might expect, each has nice benefits and limitations. But all are far better than the paltry native Windows Search tool.

Sometime I may write a more comprehensive comparison. But the web is already full of them. Read and make your own selection.

My first impressions of Yahoo Desktop Search (YDS):

• Like Copernic and Google, it operates outside Outlook (unlike Lookout).
• Like Lookout, it integrates with Outlook giving me a new toolbar that I can use for searches.
• Like Copernic, it allows me a richer set of fields to guide me through crafting more specific searches. For email, fields like From, To, Subject, Date, and others. For file searches, fields like Name, Type, Path, Date. I know that Google has excelled at simple searches, even on the desktop. But unlike web searches, I usually know a little more about the information I’m seeking on my own computer desktop. I usually can remember that it was in a Powerpoint file, or in a Word document. Google Desktop Search allows these more specific searches also, but I have to remember search parameters like filetype:ppt. DOS was simple also, but most of us preferred Windows so we would have to remember command line parameters. (Although, my occasional forays into Linux/Unix remind me how powerful command lines can be!)
• My big beef with YDS is that it takes a l—o—n—g time to start up when I reboot my computer. The splash screen stays up forever loading this and initializing that. Of course, that is better than Copernic which caused Outlook to crash more frequently (I think, of course it’s harder to be sure in a multi-tasking operating system!).

If there were only one desktop search tool, I would be happy with any of them. Google, Copernic, Lookout, Yahoo. Any of them would satisfy me if there were only one. But in the world of user choices, I like them all, each for it’s own reasons.

Which do you like? Why?