• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

The Seabourns

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • About God
  • Give

High-performing technology leaders

December 15, 2010 by Keith Seabourn 1 Comment

Who are the technologists who can translate opportunities into results? What does it take to become someone who can consistently deliver measurable results? I read an article recently that sparked my thinking.

High-performing technology leaders are leaders first, technologists second.

Leaders manage people well. They have learned the “soft skills” of leading others. Leaders know how to move a group of people from here to there. Leaders specialize in leadership. They are generalists in technology. High-performing technology leaders are still passionate about technology, but focus on the missional objectives, not the technologies.

High-performing technology leaders have learned to speak another language.

Learn to speak the language of leadership, the language of mission and business. Ask questions. Read books. Broaden your perspective. When around non-tech leaders, never, never, never talk about servers and protocols and megabytes and upload speeds. Ever!

Etched in my memory is a meeting with a technology leader and his organizational director. The discussion was about a new database system to replace the one that was about to exceed it’s maximum 1.5 million record limit. The director asked “Will this new system you are proposing last for a long time, or will it fill up like the current one?” The tech leader replied with a 15 minute explanation about how the Chunnel system linking France and the U.K. uses the same database system, has millions of passengers and vehicles a year pass through hence millions of database records added each year, and will last for many many years without exceeding the database’s maximum record limitations. The director asked his question again, “But will it last for a long time or will we be replacing it in a few years?” Another lengthy explanation. The director asked a third time. I jumped in to help the struggling tech leader saying, “What he is saying is ‘Yes, it will last a long time.'” The director thanked me for clarifying this important point.

High-performing technology leaders have found a balance.

When speaking outside the technology department, the high-performance leader speaks the language of leadership. Inside the technology department, the high-performance leader balances the language of leadership with the language of technology. The technology staff feel their leader understands the challenges they face and compromises they are making. All technology solutions are a balance, a compromise. The tech team needs to have confidence that their leader understands the issues and engages in the details.

What components of high-performance leadership have you found in technology leaders?

Filed Under: ccc, gto, Leadership

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Russ Licht says

    December 15, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    High performance technology leaders are able to evaluate the worldview of those who are creating new technology and instructing other technologists. This instruction and the technology that it produces often comes from or supports a specific worldview and that will flavor the decisions made in how to meet missional objectives.

    For instance, a technology product that is very heavy handed in its approach to solving a business problem comes from a worldview that elite people with special knowledge are the only ones who should be allowed to handle this problem. An alternative view produces a technology that may be less complex, and sometimes less powerful, but is easier to use by a large number of people. This alternative view holds fast to the belief that given good tools and basic training most people will solve this problem in a manner that suites them best.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Give a Gift

Sign up with your email address below to read our stories.

Archives

  • July 2022
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2018
  • July 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • October 2017
  • June 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2015
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • March 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • August 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004

Copyright © 2023 · Parallax Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in