• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

The Seabourns

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • About God
  • Give

Staying connected to our users

September 30, 2010 by Keith Seabourn 3 Comments

I read that Google is going to modify Gmail so that users can choose to not use the threaded Conversation View. Since it’s beginning, Gmail has threaded conversations together so it’s easy to see all my communication on each “thread” or “subject line”. However, that is not the chronological (sorted by date) way that Outlook and many other email programs tend to show messages.

Google has pushed hard and held firm to the “new way” of threaded conversations rather than chronology.

But they have “thrown in the towel” and will offer users a choice.

This isn’t the first innovation of Gmail that Google had to adapt to more traditional users’ expectations. Remember the folders vs labels war of a year or two ago? Gmail’s original author staunchly refused to provide folders, wanting to help people adapt to the much more flexible labels idea. But after a couple of years of users’ complaints, Gmail added folders.

What does this have to do with us? I’m glad you asked.

I think it’s important to push the technology envelope with innovative advances. But most people are not early adopters, and if you want many people to use your tools, you need to make evolutionary changes rather than revolutionary changes. It must be easy for people to take a small step in using your tool rather than a large step. You can more effectively introduce a new way to work by advancing in a series of small steps rather than large jumps.

Software designers in Campus Crusade: Take note! Stay connected to your users. We’re about advancing the mission more than advancing the technology.

What do you think?

Filed Under: ccc, gto, Leadership Tagged With: Leadership

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Russ says

    October 1, 2010 at 3:18 am

    I posted this article for my twitter followers and a few responded.

    @runyonski: I agree with the statement, but not the foundation. HELP them change faster. Cast vision for the post-change environment.

    @adamundefined: Sometimes people need to be pushed. Pony express to telegraph wasn’t evolutionary. Jesus was revolutionary too, just sayin’ 🙂

    My thoughts:
    I really like the exhortation to be more about the mission than advancing the technology. This needs to be at the fore-front of the minds of technology leaders.

    I also think people need to be pushed and demonstrated new ways of doing things. We really need to guard against doing the same old things with new skin. New tools bring new ways of doing things and new ways of thinking. I cannot for the life of me understand why anyone would want to go back to the old way of email. This seems like a huge step backwards in today’s conversational, collaborative landscape.

    If I have a cellphone, I should not only use it at home to make calls like when I had a landline. Carrying a mobile phone opens up new possibilities.

    I think the leadership challenge is to develop a corporate culture that can proactively think about how to use technology in new and effective missional ways rather than being stuck in let’s keep doing things the same way, but with a new technology.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Keith says

    October 1, 2010 at 8:47 am

    Thanks for soliciting input, Russ. Perhaps I stated too strongly.

    I would like to clarify. By evolutionary progress, I am not meaning to imply not changing, or not introducing new ways to move forward. But there should be a pathway from the former to the newer that makes sense, and the pathway should be a series of evolutionary steps that users can proceed down at their own pace. Early adopters can move quickly to a newer paradigm while the bell curve of most adopters can move slower. The late adopters can still use the new tool, but in ways that are very familiar to them.

    You and others did pick up on the most important thing I was trying to address. The main thing is to make sure that the main thing remains the main thing. The focus must stay on the mission. Success criteria must measure if the new tool helps us get to the mission more effectively, more efficiently, more excellently.

    Log in to Reply
  3. SoodeTekRor says

    January 31, 2012 at 3:36 pm

    Hello, i read your site, this a best site from me, thanks!

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Give a Gift

Sign up with your email address below to read our stories.

Archives

  • July 2022
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2018
  • July 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • October 2017
  • June 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2015
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • March 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • August 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004

Copyright © 2023 · Parallax Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in